| If you'll kindly reread my post sir, you'll notice I said 'if that's how it went down'. You may need further deconstruction: I posted with the explicitly stated assumption that Nixits account of the test was true. I had to assume that to make any sort of statement to explain the position of 'them'. And b/c I wasn't there, I added a clause that stated I was assuming the previous to be true. Nobody had descredited what Nixit said when I posted. So I had no reason to believe Nixit was full of bs. But let me pose the question to you: were you there? You seem to find it incredibly offensive that we would put the burden of proof for the ECU on Ash. I don't know why. If you think about it rationaly, it's up to Ash to prove that his ECU is better, not for the rest to prove that it's NOT better. -Rob
 
|
15:11:06 07/23/03
